Category Archives: Announcements

People CMM® Appraisals – 2015 Update

It is time once again to summarize data related to Class-A appraisals for the People CMM®.

Here is the updated data with the People CMM® SCAMPISM-A published results of 2015 added:

No. of People CMM® Appraisals Upto 2015

Data for 2010 to 2015 has been picked up from the Published Appraisal Results Site maintained by the CMMI Institute. Earlier data has been picked up from multiple sources as given in the table. Some appraisals may be missing from the data, if the appraised entity did not wish to publish the results (for whatever reasons).

Further analysis of the past 28 appraisals (of the last 3 years) listed in the Published Appraisal Results Site (with Filter People CMM® v2.0)  shows the following:

  • 22 of the 28 appraisals in the period 2012-2014 were led by three LAs-Lead Appraisers (Rajesh Naik, K Kothandaraman and D Sankararaman).
  • Seven different LAs did the 28 People CMM® appraisals (of the last 3 years).
  • There are 9 authorized LAs for the model on 27-Jan-2016 (the number of LAs was 11 in Jan 2015). For a list of People CMM® LAs go to the Partner Directory; select “CMMI Institute Authorized SCAMPI with People CMM Lead Appraiser” option –> you will get the list of LAs for People CMM®.
  • People CMM® organizations of the last 3 years belong to the IT/ ITes, finance, engineering, telecom, manufacturing domains.
  • Accenture – Tech units across the globe has the highest number of entries in the list of the last 3 years.

The reasons for the low number of appraisals for People CMM® have been discussed in the post Adoption of People CMM® -03: Why is it Low?  – I believe the same reasons continue to apply even today.

Hope we have a greater adoption of the model and more number of reported appraisals in 2016 and beyond.

Other related posts uploaded on the same blog:

Notes:

Nothing Official About It! – The views presented above are in no manner reflective of the official views of any organization, community, group, institute, or association. They may not even be the official views of the author :-).

SM-SCAMPI is a service mark of Carnegie Mellon University.
The People CMM® (by Bill Curtis, Bill Hefley, and Sally Miller) has been available for more than 15 years. Version 1.0 of the model was released in 1995 and version 2.0 was released in 2001.


I am Rajesh Naik. I am an author, management consultant and trainer, helping IT and other tech companies improve their processes and performance. I also specialize in CMMI® (DEV and SVC), People CMM® and Balanced Scorecard. I am a CMMI Institute certified/ authorized Instructor and Lead Appraiser for CMMI® and People CMM®. I am available on LinkedIn and I will be glad to accept your invite. For more information please click here. To get email alerts for new posts, click here to subscribe.

Mahindra Insurance Brokers Ltd (MIBL) Appraised & Rated at Maturity Level 3 of the People CMM®

On 11th Dec 2015,  Mahindra Insurance Brokers  Ltd (MIBL), India was appraised and rated at maturity level 3 of the People CMM® as a MIBL Logoresult of an appraisal conducted using SCAMPISM-A. MIBL (started in 2004)  is empanelled with various public and private insurance companies to offer best insurance solutions to customers covering Life and Non-Life areas. In addition to direct broking, MIBL also provides reinsurance broking.

The result of this SCAMPISM-A is available at the CMMI Institute site containing Published Appraisal Results (PARS).

This result has also been extensively reported in the media; two such media articles are linked here and here.

This appraisal and rating was a milestone in an ongoing journey at Mahindra Finance group of companies that was initiated around two years ago by Mr. Vinay Deshpande, their CPO (Chief People Officer).

The keys objectives of adopting the People CMM®  were to:

  • Build an Engaging, Collaborative & High-Trust Culture
  • Build a Future-Ready Organization
  • Ensure Excellence in HR Processes
  • Align HR Strategy with Business Goals

Here are a few highlights of MIBL, their people related processes, changes implemented during the People CMM® journey, benefits accrued, and future plans.

  1. MIBL is the first insurance broking organization in the world to have successfully implemented processes aligned to People CMM® maturity level 3.
  2. MIBL has, in the last two years been able to hire over 70% through employee referral, saving considerable hiring costs. This also reconfirms that employees are acting as ‘promoters’ of the organization in the job market.
  3. MIBL has significantly improved the transparency and effectiveness of its internal communication channels.
  4. During the People CMM® journey, MIBL has implemented a robust competency framework that is used for hiring, individual development, internal job postings, training, career development, and succession planning.
  5. MIBL is able to execute special business projects faster, and in a more controlled manner.
  6. MIBL is planning to implement higher maturity practices of the People CMM® in future.

Other companies of the Mahindra Group in the Finance Sector have also embraced the People CMM® framework.

We hope to share more experiences from MIBL soon on this website.

The appraisal team was led by Rajesh Naik (CMMI Institute Partner: QAI India).

Please feel free to share your views, experiences, and queries, using the “comments” feature available. You may also forward the link to this post to your friends, colleagues, and anyone else who may be interested.

Other related posts uploaded on the same blog:

Notes:

Nothing Official About It! – The views presented above are in no manner reflective of the official views of any organization, community, group, institute, or association. They may not even be the official views of the author :-).

SM-SCAMPI is a service mark of Carnegie Mellon University.


I am Rajesh Naik. I am an author, management consultant and trainer, helping IT and other tech companies improve their processes and performance. I also specialize in CMMI® (DEV and SVC), People CMM® and Balanced Scorecard. I am a CMMI Institute certified/ authorized Instructor and Lead Appraiser for CMMI® and People CMM®. I am available on LinkedIn and I will be glad to accept your invite. For more information please click here. To get email alerts for new posts, click here to subscribe.

CIA-OSS Manual for Workplace Sabotage

Recently, the CIA declassified a document titled ‘Simple Sabotage Field Manual’. This manual was created by the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the World War II–era precursor to the CIA. It is dated 1944, for use by CIA operatives in Europe who were trying to recruit civilians living in countries occupied by the Axis Alliance (Germany, Italy and Japan).

A scanned version of the document is available in the pdf form at the CIA’s website, here.

OSS-CIA Manual Cover

The documents has around 32 pages. The most interesting parts for me were in the last few pages in a section titled ‘General Interference with Organizations and Production.’

One sub-section of this part is reproduced here:

(a) Organizations and Conferences

(1) Insist on doing everything through “channels.” Never permit short-cuts to be taken in order to, expedite decisions.
(2) Make “speeches.” Talk as frequently as possible and at great length. Illustrate your “points” by long anecdotes and accounts of personal experiences. Never hesitate to make a few appropriate “patriotic” comments.
(3) When possible, refer all matters to committees, for “further study and consideration.” Attempt to make the committees as large as possible – never less than five.
(4) Bring up irrelevant issues as frequently as possible.
(5) Haggle over precise wordings of communications, minutes, resolutions.
(6) Refer back to matters decided upon at the last meeting and attempt to reopen the question of the advisability of that decision.
(7) Advocate “caution.” Be “reasonable” and urge your fellow-conferees to be “reasonable” and avoid haste which might result in embarrassments or difficulties later on.
(8) Be worried about the propriety of any decision -raise the question of whether such action as is contemplated lies within the jurisdiction of the group or whether it might conflict with the policy of some higher echelon.

The manual continues to other such sub-sections titled (b) Managers and Supervisors, (c) Office Workers, and (d) Employees. You can read all the sections in pages 28-32 of the manual available here.

What is amazing is that I see this behavior in most organizations, displayed by most people, though they may not have been recruited by the CIA (at least, I think CIA has better sense than to spend money when there is no need).

And that is why you have management gurus and management consultancy firms, much in demand, trying to reverse the situation, with maybe negligible effect. We have experts in OD, employee motivation, leadership development. operational efficiency, process management, organizational alignment, Balanced Scorecard, Six-Sigma, Lean, Agile, ISO, CMMI®, People CMM®, and so on…, but nothing seems to change.

The  beauty of the principles in the document are so inherently ‘aligned’ to human nature, that these principles have insidiously and organically crept into all aspects of all organizations, maybe even in the CIA.

I leave you to draw your own conclusions. Read pages 28-32 of the manual available here.

Please feel free to share your views, experiences, and queries, using the “comments” feature available. You may also forward the link to this post to your friends, colleagues, and anyone else who may be interested.

Notes:

Nothing Official About It! – The views presented above are in no manner reflective of the official views of any organization, community, group, institute, or association. They may not even be the official views of the author :-).


I am Rajesh Naik. I am an author, management consultant and trainer, helping IT and other tech companies improve their processes and performance. I also specialize in CMMI® (DEV and SVC), People CMM® and Balanced Scorecard. I am a CMMI Institute certified/ authorized Instructor and Lead Appraiser for CMMI® and People CMM®. I am available on LinkedIn and I will be glad to accept your invite. For more information please click here. To get email alerts for new posts, click here to subscribe.

Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd (MMFSL) Appraised & Rated at Maturity Level 3 of the People CMM®

On 30th Sept, 2015,  Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd (MMFSL), India was appraised and rated at maturity level 3 of the People CMM® as a MMFSL Logoresult of an appraisal conducted using SCAMPISM-A. MMFSL (started in 1991) is a large NBFC (Non-Banking Financial Company) with a workforce of more than 14K people.

The result of this SCAMPISM-A is available at the CMMI Institute site containing Published Appraisal Results (PARS), here (https://sas.cmmiinstitute.com/pars/pars_detail.aspx?a=25252).

This result has also been reported in the media, here.

This appraisal and rating was a milestone in an ongoing journey at MMFSL that was initiated around two years ago by Mr. Vinay Deshpande, their CPO (Chief People Officer). The objective was to improve the skills, motivation, engagement, and alignment of their people for achieving higher levels of organizational performance.

Here are a few highlights of MMFSL, their people related processes, changes implemented during the People CMM® journey, benefits accrued, and future plans.

  • MMFSL is the first NBFC in India with a large workforce (over 14K employees), with a pan-India presence to have successfully implemented maturity level 3 aligned processes.
  • MMFSL has, in the last two years been able to hire over 60% through employee referral, saving considerable hiring costs. This also reconfirms that employees are acting as ‘promoters’ of the organization in the job market.
  • During the People CMM® journey, MMFSL has implemented a robust competency framework that is used for hiring, individual development, internal job postings, training, and succession planning.

Other companies of the Mahindra Group in the Finance Sector are also adopting the People CMM® framework.

We hope to share more experiences from MMFSL soon on this website.

The appraisal team was led by Rajesh Naik (CMMI Institute Partner: QAI India).

Please feel free to share your views, experiences, and queries, using the “comments” feature available. You may also forward the link to this post to your friends, colleagues, and anyone else who may be interested.

Other related posts uploaded on the same blog:

Notes:

Nothing Official About It! – The views presented above are in no manner reflective of the official views of any organization, community, group, institute, or association. They may not even be the official views of the author :-).

SM-SCAMPI is a service mark of Carnegie Mellon University.


I am Rajesh Naik. I am an author, management consultant and trainer, helping IT and other tech companies improve their processes and performance. I also specialize in CMMI® (DEV and SVC), People CMM® and Balanced Scorecard. I am a CMMI Institute certified/ authorized Instructor and Lead Appraiser for CMMI® and People CMM®. I am available on LinkedIn and I will be glad to accept your invite. For more information please click here. To get email alerts for new posts, click here to subscribe.

Intro to CMMI® for Development (course) on Nov 4-6, 2015 in Bangalore

[This course was completed on Nov 6th – there was 16 participants]

Another such course may be organized in Bangalore around June 2016. In case you are interested, please send an email to naik.rajeshnaik@gmail.com.

A CMMI® Institute authorized 3-day course “Introduction to CMMI® for Development” is scheduled for Nov 4-6, 2015, in Bangalore, India. The course instructor is Rajesh Naik.

The course is open to public for nominations. It is organized by QAI India Ltd.

The dates are Nov 4-6, 2015.

[This course was completed on Nov 6th – there was 16 participants]

Another such course may be organized in Bangalore around June 2016. In case you are interested, please send an email to naik.rajeshnaik@gmail.com.


I am Rajesh Naik. I am an author, management consultant and trainer, helping IT and other tech companies improve their processes and performance. I also specialize in CMMI® (DEV and SVC), People CMM® and Balanced Scorecard. I am a CMMI Institute certified/ authorized Instructor and Lead Appraiser for CMMI® and People CMM®. I am available on LinkedIn and I will be glad to accept your invite. For more information please click here. To get email alerts for new posts, click here to subscribe.

RCF (Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers) Successfully Adopts the People CMM®

RCF LogoOn 23rd January, 2015, Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Limited (RCF), India was rated at maturity level 2 of the People CMM® as a result of an appraisal conducted using SCAMPISM-A.

The result of this SCAMPISM-A is available at the CMMI Institute site containing Published Appraisal Results (PARS), here (https://sas.cmmiinstitute.com/pars/pars_detail.aspx?a=23729).

This result has also been reported in the media, here.

This appraisal and rating was a milestone in an ongoing journey at RCF to improve the skills, motivation, engagement, and alignment of their people for achieving higher levels of organizational performance.

The adoption of the People CMM® by RCF is a bold initiative because it is possibly without precedence on many aspects. Here are a few key aspects in which RCF may be a pioneer in adopting the model:

  1.  RCF is a public sector undertaking (PSU) in India. Very few other Indian PSUs have adopted the People CMM® and none have successfully completed a SCAMPISM-A appraisal. RCF may even be the first  public sector organization in the world to be rated at any maturity level of the People CMM®  (though I can’t be sure, because the definition of a PSU varies across the world).
  2. RCF is involved in continuous manufacturing, sales, distribution and marketing of fertilizers and industrial chemicals. RCF is one of the very few in this industry (and may be the first) to achieve maturity level 2 of the People CMM®.
  3. RCF is over 50 years old and possibly the ‘oldest’ organization to have successfully completed a SCAMPISM-A appraisal.

RCF is currently a ‘Mini Ratna Cat-1’ PSU. According to news reports (see here and here), RCF’s status is likely to be upgraded to a ‘NavRatna’, given its past performance and new initiatives that it pursues. The ‘NavRatna’ status will increase RCF’s financial autonomy – some details are available on this wikipedia page.

RCF’s executive management is keen to share RCF’s experiences with other organizations. Some of this sharing will be soon published at AlignMentor.

The appraisal team was led by Rajesh Naik (CMMI Institute Partner: QAI India).

Please feel free to share your views, experiences, and queries, using the “comments” feature available. You may also forward the link to this post to your friends, colleagues, and anyone else who may be interested.

Notes:

Nothing Official About It! – The views presented above are in no manner reflective of the official views of any organization, community, group, institute, or association. They may not even be the official views of the author :-).

SM-SCAMPI is a service mark of Carnegie Mellon University.


I am Rajesh Naik. I am an author, management consultant and trainer, helping IT and other tech companies improve their processes and performance. I also specialize in CMMI® (DEV and SVC), People CMM® and Balanced Scorecard. I am a CMMI Institute certified/ authorized Instructor and Lead Appraiser for CMMI® and People CMM®. I am available on LinkedIn and I will be glad to accept your invite. For more information please click here. To get email alerts for new posts, click here to subscribe.

SCAMPI(sm)-A Enhanced with APR – Action Plan Reappraisal

Situation before APR option was available

Prior to the December 2014 release of APR, if a SCAMPISM-A resulted in an unsatisfactory rating(s) (e.g., a lower maturity level than the target maturity level), the organizational unit had to address the issues that had negatively impacted the rating and then do a new appraisal to achieve the target level. They did not receive any credit for the first (failed) appraisal.

Organizations obviously did not want to risk the chance of a failed appraisal, because in addition to correcting the identified negative issues, they would have to do the entire planning, scoping and sampling, artifact collection, artifact review, affirmations,  characterizations, ratings, and so on. Doing another appraisal was very time-consuming and expensive.

To play “safe” and avoid any chance of failing, organizations tended to postpone their appraisal till they were absolutely sure of achieving their target rating(s). This often led to delays in initiating the SCAMPISM-A. Organizations  also conducted excessive and unnecessary mini-appraisals in different avatars (pre-appraisal, SCAMPISM-B, SCAMPISM-C) to be doubly sure.

To address this, the CMMI Institute has enhanced the SCAMPISM-A method (released in end-Dec 2014) to allow for delta appraisals, within a limited time-frame, where the ‘failed’ SCAMPISM-A can be extended. This enhancement is called APR (Action Plan Reappraisal) and is built into the SCAMPISM-A, as an additional, optional phase.

More Details on the APR (Action Plan Reappraisal)

Before the APR option was available, the SCAMPISM-A had 3 phases, namely:

  • Phase-1: Plan and Prepare for Appraisal
  • Phase-2: Conduct Appraisal
  • Phase-3: Report Results

The new, optional phase, Phase-4 added in end-Dec 2014 is:

  • Phase-4: Action Plan Reappraisal

Action Plan Reappraisal

Here are some important aspects of the APR:

  • The APR (i.e., Final Findings of the APR) must be completed within 120 days of the Final Findings of the main SCAMPISM-A.
  • Only one APR can be conducted for a SCAMPISM-A.
  • The sponsor decides whether an APR is to be conducted or not (the appraisal team may advise the sponsor, but the final call is the sponsor’s). The APR is not mandatory, even if the target rating(s) has not been achieved.
  • The same ATL (Appraisal Team Leader) should continue in the APR (the method includes ways to handle exceptions to this).
  • The same ATMs must participate in the APR. There are some additional rules which require ATMs to examine the objective evidence related to the goals being re-investigated. If all ATMs are not available for some reason, the method includes ways to handle that situation.
  • At a minimum, all practices of the goals that were rated as Unsatisfied or Not Rated must be covered in the APR. More goals can be added if the appraisal team feels that the corrections to the weaknesses may impact other goals. However, the sponsor can explicitly reduce the model scope, and exclude some maturity levels or process areas from the APR.
  • The same basic units and support functions (from the original appraisal) need to be picked up in the APR. However, the sponsor can explicitly reduce the organizational unit, and the appraisal team can investigate additional basic units (from within the organizational unit).

Listing in PARS

If the APR option is chosen, no new listing will be made in PARS till the APR is completed.

After the APR is completed, the ratings achieved (as a result of the original SCAMPISM-A and the APR) will be listed in PARS (subject to sponsor’s permission).

The date of the appraisal result will be the date of the Final Findings of the original SCAMPISM-A (not of the APR). The three year validity will start from the date of the Final Findings of the original SCAMPISM-A.

PARs will NOT indicate whether the APR option was used or not.

PARs will show the final scope for which the appraisal was successful. If the scope was reduced during the APR, the PARS will show this reduced scope.

More Material

Links with more material:

  • The APR has been explained in simple, lucid terms by Pat O’Toole and Jeff Dalton. It is hosted on Jeff Dalton’s Blog – Ask the CMMI Appraiser. Read it!
  • The SCAMPI Method Definition Document (also called MDD) V1.3b, Dec 2014 includes the APR phase. Register and download the pdf from here (if you like to wallow in legalese)
  • Discussions between lead appraisers on the positive and negative aspects related to APR on a LinkedIn Group

By the way, this provides an opportunity for organizations and lead appraisers to be first in something 🙂

  • First successful APR
  • First unsuccessful APR
  • First APR with reduced model scope
  • …. and many more… 🙂

SM-SCAMPI is a service mark of Carnegie Mellon University.

Please feel free to to share your views, experiences, and queries, using the “comments” feature available.
You may also forward the link to this post to your friends, colleagues, and anyone else who may be interested.

Notes:

Nothing Official About It! – The views presented above are in no manner reflective of the official views of any organization, community, group, institute, country, government, or association. They may not even be the official views of the author of this post :-).

 


I am Rajesh Naik. I am an author, management consultant and trainer, helping IT and other tech companies improve their processes and performance. I also specialize in CMMI® (DEV and SVC), People CMM® and Balanced Scorecard. I am a CMMI Institute certified/ authorized Instructor and Lead Appraiser for CMMI® and People CMM®. I am available on LinkedIn and I will be glad to accept your invite. For more information please click here. To get email alerts for new posts, click here to subscribe.

Extension Appraisals and Delta Appraisals – Planned changes in SCAMPI(sm)

Some months ago, a new version of the MDD (v1.3a) was released. One of the reactions to the announcement was “does it have provision for extending current appraisal results beyond 3 years?” Or “Is there some kind of surveillance being added to increase the validity?” or “is there a SCAMPISM – M (M for maintenance) in this new version?” Well, the version released in Oct 2013 (v1.3a) does not have it.

However, the draft of a new version contains proposals for extension of appraisal results.

There are two key proposed enhancements in the SCAMPISM method. These are a part of the draft version (v1.4 draft) of the MDD and have been circulated for review comments. The two key enhancements are:

  1. SCAMPISM A Extension (SCAMPISM-E, also known as SCAMPISM-M – maintenance). If approved, this will be an option available to entities that are already appraised on SCAMPISM-A and would like to extend the validity/ expiry date of their appraisal rating(s) beyond the 3 year period, at a lower cost, effort, on-site period, and disruption.
  2. Action Plan Reappraisals (Delta appraisals). Note: Action Plan Reappraisals have been incorporated in the SCAMPI method since Dec 2014. Read more about it here.
    At present, if an organization “fails” their target rating(s), we have to carry out a full SCAMPISM-A reappraisal after fixing the weaknesses. This means a high cost, effort, on-site period, and disruption, even if the re-appraisal is within a short period of the original failed appraisal. Action Plan Reappraisals (if approved) provides an option for the organization to do a reappraisal that is focussed in and around the offending areas (areas of weaknesses responsible for the unsatisfactory ratings), with lower appraisal overhead.

As expected, these two enhancements come with their conditions and parameters and limits and their own methods/ processes. Please note that these two additions/ enhancements are in the draft/ pilot/ review stages and what is finally released may be significantly different.

Read on if these are of interest to you…

Extension Appraisals

Present versions of the MDD do not include any form of surveillance audits (like ISO 9001). The proposal introduces the concept of performing an appraisal to extend the validity period of SCAMPISM A ratings with a significantly reduced cost while maintaining the integrity of the SCAMPISM A results. Here are some highlights of the proposed enhancement:

  1. SCAMPISM-A Extension (let us call it SCAMPISM-E) can be used to extended the validity of the SCAMPISM-A by 2 years.
  2. The SCAMPISM-E needs to be conducted before the expiry of SCAMPISM-A validity
  3. SCAMPISM-E can be used only once for a SCAMPISM-A to extend the validity. That means a second extension cannot be done. So, after the validity period (2 years) of the extension, a full SCAMPISM-A needs to conducted for a fresh rating (or a set  of ratings).
  4. For SCAMPISM-E eligibility, the OU should not have undergone changes in their sampling factors and sampling factor values (type of work, locations, organization structure, etc.) between the SCAMPISM-A and the SCAMPISM-E.
  5. The OU and the model scope (e.g., target maturity level, PAs, capability levels) cannot be increased from that used the original SCAMPISM-A  (though the SCAMPISM-E scope can decrease from the original SCAMPISM-A)
  6. Along with other conditions, the SCAMPISM-E investigation must cover at least 1/3 of the model sope applicable (1/3 of the specific goals and 1/3 of the generic practices). This aspect is expected to bring in significant savings in effort, and cycle time during the onsite period.
  7. The subset of specific goals and generic practices proposed for investigation need to be reviewed by the CMMI Institute. The CMMI Institute can select additional specific goals and generic practices.

Action Plan Reappraisal

At present, if a SCAMPISM-A results in an adverse rating (lower than the target level(s)), the organization needs to go through the whole SCAMPISM-A process to get the desired rating. This could mean a different sample of projects, and hence collection of data, and sometimes interviewing the same set of people and asking similar questions all over again. The Action Plan Reappraisal provides the organization the option of addressing the weaknesses and subsequently performing a reappraisal that will, if successful, result in obtaining targeted appraisal ratings. Some highlights:

  1. If approved, the action plan reappraisal (Delta reappraisal) option will be available for a SCAMPISM-A as well as a SCAMPISM-A Extension (SCAMPISM-E) discussed above
  2. To be valid, this reappraisal needs to be completed within a defined period (4 months) of the ‘failed’ appraisal
  3. In the reappraisal, the goals that were determined as not satisfied need to be re-examined
  4. Only one such action plan reappraisal is permitted

Please note that these two additions/ enhancements are in the draft/ pilot/ review stages and what is finally released may be significantly different, or may not get approved at all for some time.

You can get more information in the links below:

Discussions on linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/SCAMPI-Maintenance-Appraisal-SCAMPI-M-54046.S.176296625

A presentation from Nov 2012 @ NDIA Conference: http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2012CMMI/W15024_Campo.pdf

SM-SCAMPI is a service mark of Carnegie Mellon University.

Please feel free to to share your views, experiences, and queries, using the “comments” feature available.
You may also forward the link to this post to your friends, colleagues, and anyone else who may be interested.

Notes:

Nothing Official About It! – The views presented above are in no manner reflective of the official views of any organization, community, group, institute, country, government, or association. They may not even be the official views of the author of this post :-).


I am Rajesh Naik. I am an author, management consultant and trainer, helping IT and other tech companies improve their processes and performance. I also specialize in CMMI® (DEV and SVC), People CMM® and Balanced Scorecard. I am a CMMI Institute certified/ authorized Instructor and Lead Appraiser for CMMI® and People CMM®. I am available on LinkedIn and I will be glad to accept your invite. For more information please click here. To get email alerts for new posts, click here to subscribe.

New SCAMPI MDD (v1.3a) Released on Oct, 2013

The CMMI Institute has released a new version of the SCAMPISM MDD in October 2013. The full title is Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) Version 1.3a: Method Definition Document for SCAMPI A, B, and C.

The new version may be downloaded from the CMMI Institute site.

From January 1, 2014, all appraisal submissions (including SCAMPISM Class B and C) must comply with the new document.

So, what are the key changes in the new method?

  1. The main change has been to upgrade the Class B and Class C methods to v1.3. The earlier version of MDD addressed only the Class A method. Till the release of v1.3a, Class B and C were covered by a Handbook whose version was v1.1. This handbook was not compatible with version 1.3 of ARC. And the current SAS (appraisal database) was out of sync in its terminology with the handbook. All that seems to be now rectified. SCAMPISM Class B and C methodolgy will be compatible with the current SAS and ARC v1.3.
  2. A quick scan of the new MDD did not show any change to the SCAMPISM  Class A method. It remains the same as in the earlier version of the MDD (v1.3). So, no significant change is needed if you have started planning a Class – A SCAMPISM  appraisal in the near future. However, it will be better to download the new document and confirm for yourself.

Download the new version from here.

SM-SCAMPI is a service mark of Carnegie Mellon University.

Please feel free to to share your views, experiences, and queries, using the “comments” feature available.
You may also forward the link to this post to your friends, colleagues, and anyone else who may be interested.

Notes:

Nothing Official About It! – The views presented above are in no manner reflective of the official views of any organization, community, group, institute, country, government, or association. They may not even be the official views of the author of this post :-).


I am Rajesh Naik. I am an author, management consultant and trainer, helping IT and other tech companies improve their processes and performance. I also specialize in CMMI® (DEV and SVC), People CMM® and Balanced Scorecard. I am a CMMI Institute certified/ authorized Instructor and Lead Appraiser for CMMI® and People CMM®. I am available on LinkedIn and I will be glad to accept your invite. For more information please click here. To get email alerts for new posts, click here to subscribe.

HMBP Conference 2013 on 24th Sept in Pune and 27th in Bangalore, India

The HMBP Conference (an annual event in its 4th year), showcases what leading organizations are doing and are planning to do in their implementation of high maturity practices.

This year, the HMBP Conference theme is “High Maturity Impacts: Interweaving Services and People” and it is also being held in two cities.

  • at a new venue – Pune on September 24th, 2013
  • in its regular den – Bangalore on September 27th, 2013

Since nobody could figure out the difference between a “Colloquium” and a “Conference”, I believe the organizers decided to stick to the more traditional word. 🙂


I am Rajesh Naik. I am an author, management consultant and trainer, helping IT and other tech companies improve their processes and performance. I also specialize in CMMI® (DEV and SVC), People CMM® and Balanced Scorecard. I am a CMMI Institute certified/ authorized Instructor and Lead Appraiser for CMMI® and People CMM®. I am available on LinkedIn and I will be glad to accept your invite. For more information please click here. To get email alerts for new posts, click here to subscribe.