I encountered another problem in the same book (I will disclose the name of the book in a later post along with the answer). Here is the problem:
Two contestants have reached the last round of a TV quiz contest and one of them is hoping to be the winner of a prize of 10 mn (currency deliberately left vague) via a tie-breaker. Even after the tie-breaker, neither of them has beaten the other.
The show-host offers to break the tie with a coin (my guess is that the show host did not have any more questions left :-)). However, to maintain the suspense and gain more TRP, he proposes that the winner will be one who reaches six (6) correct calls first.
After 8 flips, contestant A has 5 correct calls, and contestant B has 3 correct calls. At this stage both the contestants agree NOT to continue with the flipping of the coin (maybe the coin is lost or it breaks or falls into something disgusting – use your imagination). They have to decide on the winner based on result of the 8 flips.
Here are some proposals:
- Contestant A says that since he is leading, he should get the 10mn.
- Contestant B says that since the flipping was called off before the final result, the 10mn should be shared equally.
- The show-host says that TV quiz program sponsors should retain the 10mn, since both the contestants agreed to call off the contest.
- Someone from the audience suggests that the prize money be split in the 5:3 ratio (5 for A and 3 for B), in line with the number of right calls
- A mathematician calls in to suggest that the money be split A7:B1 (try and guess the logic here, it is related to the probability of winning from this point, if the flipping had continued)
- Any other…
It is interesting to note so many options to a simple situation.
Please share your suggestions in the “comments” feature available below.